![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
75.89.255.103
In Reply to: RE: other posters said it was no good, so it was in question. posted by Tre' on September 28, 2017 at 20:47:32
Yes, at twice the price. He states in his article that the hammond is his budget opt of choice. My whole point is that for me it isn't worth the higher price for the extra 5% I might get in sound. It's a cost/benefit analysis on my part. I'm on a fixed income now, and I have to make sure I do not spend money I do not need to if I want to build projects. Besides, at the rate I change which amp is my current main squeese I would go broken using the high priced spread considering I give some of them away.
Edits: 09/29/17
I have no problem with what you just said.
But the EP transformer is a better transformer with more frequency extension and that is not an opinion, it is just fact.
If the Hammonds work for you that's fine but don't try to say that they are better than the EPs or try to say that people that say the EPs are better than the Hammonds (and the EPs are better than the Hammonds) are just stating their opinions.
Facts really do exist and you will understand how electronics work much faster once you recognize that.
Tre'
Have Fun and Enjoy the Music
"Still Working the Problem"
Will you PLEASE stop putting words in my mouth. I never said anyone was better than the other. I said that the 125ese provides a lot of bang for the buck. Each person has to decide for themselves how much bang they want to purchase. Others then jumped in and started spouting numbers to prove the 125ese was no good at all and that is just not true.
Edits: 09/29/17 10/02/17
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: