|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
76.126.5.126
So I grabbed a bunch of my old CD's yesterday, headed out to Amoeba SF to get some store credit, and came away with a pretty good haul, with a number of hi-rez titles included. The first one I wanted to write about was the Channel Classics release of Szymanowski's violin works played by Jared's babe violinist (every label has to have a babe violinist these days!), Rosanne Philiippens.My shoot-from-the-hip reaction to having listened to it the first time is: Yes! - for both the performances and the engineering! In my experience, this is a new level of the music's disembodiment from the actual speaker locations in my room. Well done!
I'm still not entirely on board with Szymanowski's music however (even though I just performed "La fontaine d'Arethus" with a local student violinist a few months ago - very complex ensemble challenges BTW!). I still find Szymanowski's compositional style elusive and (if I may say so) inconsistent, compared with, say, Scriabin's (to name one of his stylistic cousins). That's not to say that I haven't acquired a few recordings of this music over the years - and, believe me, Rosanne has some pretty stiff recorded competition in this repertoire (just the chamber works with piano), even if we confine ourselves to recordings by other babe violinists, starting with the classic Kaja Danczowska / Krystian Zimerman DG release from 35 years ago. Another one that's really on a super-high level is the Hyperion recording by Pouty Lips (oops! I mean Alina Ibragimova) from about six years ago. Just these two recordings would be enough to discourage any newcomer, but it seems that, in preparing this release, Rosanne has steeped herself in the aesthetic backgrounds of Szymanowski and his music, as she writes:
". . . I recognized Ovid's Metamorphoses. I managed to track down the poems of Szymanowski's countryman, Tadeusz Micinski, which inspired him. In pursuit of the composer's roots, I visited his villa Atma, where I heard the wonderful music of the mountains of Zakopane, which moved him as well."
I'm impressed, and, more importantly, I feel that Rosanne and her pianist, Julien Quinten, really do hold their own with these great recordings of the past. The same holds true for the Concerto and the Stravinsky items on this release too. Where Rosanne has the advantage is that, because of the fabulous sound quality, we can hear the detail and subtlety which have gone into her playing and interpretations in a way that the earlier CD-rez recordings don't always allow.
BTW, kudos to SA-CD.net's reviewer ("Castor") for calling out booklet note writer Clemens Romijn's fanciful (I'm tempted to say, ridiculous) suggestion that the Szymanowski Concerto is "the Violin Concerto that Mahler never wrote"! And Romijn's evidence is. . . both Mahler and Szymanowski use a similarly "romantic orchestral palatte"? C'mon, pal - you gotta do better than that!
Edits: 05/01/15Follow Ups:
It is ironic that in the thread below re: Jon Leif's music that I used the whimsical description that Leif's music sounded like craggy, snow-topped mountains. I guess mountains DO have sound after all.
Regarding Szym's music, I certainly agree with your assessment - it doesn't do much for me. But neither does Scriabin's, try as I might to appreciate it. It's what is holding me back from writing a review over at SACD_net of the recent BIS SACD release of Scriabin/Medtner piano concertos with the phenomenally talented Yevgeny Sudbin. Everything about this release is terrific EXCEPT for the fact that I simply don't like the Scriabin concerto. Blehhh!
But that Scriabin Piano Concerto is an early work and pretty mild for Scriabin. On more than one occasion, I've fooled my wife by playing the second movement (theme and variations) and asking her who the composer is. It's deceptive, because it KIND of sounds like Chopin, but not quite. For some reason, she never thinks of Scriabin, and always guesses "somebody trying to imitate Chopin"! ;-)
Also, you have to admit that the Scriabin Concerto has the virtue of brevity, compared to other Romantic piano concertos. In any case, I'm really zoned in on Scriabin's evolution even to his most far-out late pieces - there's a consistency to the music IMHO, even if one of the ingredients to that consistency is a kind of sickly creepiness! ;-)
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: