Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences.
Return to Planar Speaker Asylum
85.188.73.5
In Reply to: RE: IME dipoles do not respond well to typical symmetrical steep crossovers posted by Timbo in Oz on October 18, 2016 at 03:22:24
If going from a 4th order to a 3rd order low pass, should not the phasing of the woofers be changed?
Follow Ups:
The polarity needs to remain inverted - remember Magnepan did not mention changing the polarity with their recommendation.Here is the OEM xo (LP 4th order @ 280 and HP 1st order @ 200):
and here is the Magnepan recommended xo for biamping (LP 3rd order @ 250 and HP 1st order @ 200):
In either case the filters need to be "phase aligned". The output curves are similar and I expect good success with either but the 4th order will be closer to the original voicing.
I married the perfect woman. The downside is everything that goes wrong is my fault.
Edits: 10/19/16 10/19/16
The acoustic rolloff of the midrange is between 2nd and 3rd order so the combined XO is legit in either alignment. In my case, with a line of Neo8 the rolloff is rather clearly 2nd order so the 3rd order alignment has clear benefit. Besides which, the 3rd order Ashly XO I use for the bottom LP has more flexibility with its Q control so you have a family of roloffs at any freq you are trying. .
That is implicit with odd order slopes.
Warmest
Tim Bailey
Skeptical Measurer & Audio Scrounger
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: