|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
107.174.244.12
In Reply to: RE: Will those edge treatments work .... posted by emailtim on September 13, 2018 at 14:18:00
Ok, I'm back from vacation. (Note to self: Avoid going to China by way of North Korea).
"Edge treatments" in audio, are usually done with a coloured marker. Although there may be some other types of audio treatments people effect for "edge treatments" that utilize liquids or creams, we'll stick with the good ol' "green pen" et al. for this discourse. This was all started a few decades ago, with the introduction of the "CD Stoplight" green pen. (Although a lesser known but similar edge treatment marker was P.W.B.'s "Chunky Pen"). Cheapos will use regular off-the-shelf pens and markers for edge treatment tweaks, which I'm fine with. But they should not be expected to be as effective as the purpose-built products.
Now for my next trick, I'll attempt to answer your queries, as if you were serious, with deadly serious answers...-
1. Just the outer edges. And it will indeed improve the sound from your so-called (ha!) "bit-perfect" rips. Except that you won't be able to play them, because once you take the platters out of your hard drive, your data is shot (idiot). As with CD's, you place 3 or 4 marks about 1" in length, around the perimeter of the disc for best result, not the entire edge.
2. If you have an SSD, you would try the same method, the edge. It's why they call it an "-edge- treatment", get it?
Now, aside from your risible notion that ripping a CD will result in a copy sounding exactly the same because you've called it "bit perfect", the other area of ignorance you wade into, is believing that these edge treatments work on the media you apply them to.
They don't.
I've been debating the green pens with professional skeptics on-line for at least a quarter of a century, and the ignorance about them just doesn't ever get any better. Most skeptics never even tried the products, and if they did and thought they heard differences, they would just ascribe it to a placebo. Because it couldn't possibly have an effect, right? And like this, most audio freaks are scared to just wander outside of their ideological fences around their cranial property, for fear they'll be bitten by the ideological wolves that lay in wait to attack them and everything they know in their small ideas of the world.
Of course, that is correct. The green markers couldn't possibly have an effect. Not if you believe that it works on principles stated by the manufacturer; or other skeptics. When it comes to avant garde audio inventions, here's a secret I will share with you tonight: manufacturers don't always know how their products work. They don't always get it right. The good people at "CD Stoplight" tried to, bless their souls. But then their hypothesis was easily discounted, when people pointed out that the green color cannot have an effect upon the wavelength used by lasers. Let alone affect the 1's and 0's, or the "bit-perfectness".
And that's because it has no such effect on the laser, or even the medium. So, if you -were- fool enough to open your hard drive, take out the platters and treat them (and note, I'm not saying you're -not-), we'll guess what, Sparky? It'll still have an effect. Obviously, not on any music stored on the platters you just quiched. But whatever effect it has (and the effect depends on the marker used as well as the color), it will have that effect on anything you play, anywhere in your home. That's because edge treatments, like pretty much —everything else in audio—, are what some people might call "listener related tweaks". ie. Tweaks that affect the listener's -perception- of sound**; not the sound signal itself.
(**Not to be confused with the infamous placebo effect. This is a -real- effect).
"CD Stoplight" is hardly the only manufacturer who, it appears, doesn't quite know how their bleeding edge tweaks work. I suspect that "Machina Dynamica" would also fall into those cracks. I mean, I read the hypothesis for "Brilliant Pebbles", having something to do with vibrations or EMI/RFI. Ok, really? Well, I haven't tried them, let alone tested, so I don't know if that's a possibility. But I did recently try experimenting with crystal rocks that at least look something like the "Pebbles". This was a small, yellow crystal of some sort, that I bought in a health food store - just to see what it "sounded" like. I tried the usual places, on top of speakers and under stuff, and I didn't really care for the effect it had on my 'sound'. That is, until I placed it under my couch cushion (where it has remained). That made an improvement on the sound that I liked; enough to think about going and getting some more. But I doubt that that's due to an effect on EMI, and in that location, I know it's not controlling resonances from the components. In any case, I don't blame the manufacturers. This world is overrun by skeptics and cynics, and "We don't really know how it works so just shut up and enjoy the fact that it does" does not a great marketing slogan make.
So how do the green/red/black markers work, anyway? Shut up and enjoy them, that's how. Actually, the working hypothesis for that (partly based on years of my own experiments in the field), is even harder for the usual skeptics to swallow. Who, if I try to explain it, will be thinking that colouring the edge of a CD to affect the laser light sounds perfectly viable at this point...-.
It starts with understanding how (if not why), all objects carry active energy fields, that exhibit their own patterns. It's what gives both vinyl records and CD's their characteristic sounds; as well as every part of every audio component/thing ever made (the "energy" doesn't actually know an audio component from a jar of Shinola). You can change these patterns however, and indeed, they are changing around us all the time in subtle ways, with everything we do. These 'energy patterns' affect levels of tension within us, which in turn, affects human sense. Including sound, yes. This is why you can "greenify" a CD or LP that isn't even playing, and it will still be possible to hear an improvement in sound from doing so. And don't assume it definitely isn't going to work on the edge of a circuit board, like an SSD (though that's not something I've personally tested). It'll probably have an effect on the edge of a piece of paper. What matters most is creating patterns that improve the human sense of sound; and does not degrade it. (Easier said than done).
But don't get confused, or get stupid on me. This isn't just an explanation for "crazy/magic audio tweaks". It relates to -all- audio, as well as -everything- around us. Nor does it replace conventional (so-called "scientific") understanding of how audio and audio components work. It works alongside it, as it always has, throughout human history. You can't understand any of what I'm explaining with words, you have to try to understand as I have, with experimentation. The green pen is, IMESHO, a good place for neophytes like you (and most others here), to start. Why not. I've even seen skeptics admit they heard changes after "greening" (edge treatments).
That may be what I was experimenting on thirty years ago, but I've moved on from that. It's kind of sad, upon reflection, to see forumers talk about this tweak today from decades ago, and still laughing about it, thinking that it's bogus and doesn't work. I would like to have thought three decades into the future, the world will have progressed a bit. The green pen may have fallen out of fashion since, continuing to be held as a classic example of "audiofool lunacy" by dogmatic fools...- But unfortunately, it did have a real (if not measurable) effect, and still does. It's just that there's a million other treatments now that I can do to improve sound, that work better for my money. So I haven't bothered with green pens in ages.
Still, what's great about it, and any other avant-garde tweak, is that it doesn't much matter if CD's have gone the way of the dodo bird. You have some around, you can still improve the sound of your media streaming device, your Sonos, or your bluetooth speakers. Because, again, these things have zero effect on the sound. They simply affect the listener's ability to perceive sound. Like everything else in life.
You forgot that already, didn't you?
Follow Ups:
"Of course, that is correct. The green markers couldn't possibly have an effect. Not if you believe that it works on principles stated by the manufacturer; or other skeptics. When it comes to avant garde audio inventions, here's a secret I will share with you tonight: manufacturers don't always know how their products work. They don't always get it right. The good people at "CD Stoplight" tried to, bless their souls. But then their hypothesis was easily discounted, when people pointed out that the green color cannot have an effect upon the wavelength used by lasers. Let alone affect the 1's and 0's, or the "bit-perfectness".
The reason the Green Pen works is because, although the nominal wavelength of a CD laser is 780 nm, near infrared, part of the spectrum is in the visible red portion of the spectrum. The beam of the laser is not monochromatic. The CD laser has a bandwidth of 100 nm or so. It's just a simple device with two filters. The reason it has visible red content is for safety reasons. And since green or blue green is the absorbing color for red, the sound is improved by the Green Pen since part of the scattered laser light will be absorbed.
But things have got better and now we can absorb not only the 30% or so of scattered light that's visible red but also the other 70% that's invisible light above 700 nm. It just a little time to solve the problem. Difficult problems we solve quickly the impossible ones take a little longer.
As for the PWB purple pen it works on LPs too so by inspection it has nothing to do with the CD laser.
The color black should only be used for the inner lip or edge of the CD. You can also substitute purple pen for green or turquoise around the outer edge. Let me state the basic problem. It's that the CD laser beam is mostly invisible so the scattered invisible part is not treatable by colors, even green. But green IS audible because a small portion (visible red) of the scattered laser light is absorbed, about 1/4 of the light. The rest of the scattered laser light is above 780 nm and extends up to about 850 nm. Only my product New Dark Matter is capable of absorbing invisible infrared light (as well as the visible red portion). New Dark Matter in fact absorbs all light, so can be used for CD, Blu Ray, SACD, DVD.
Edits: 05/07/22
I'm filing that whole diatribe under Whatever. And I don't have the motivation to say where you went wrong. Live and let die.
Edits: 10/15/18
First of all, that "diatribe" as you call it, wasn't even addressing you. So I don't know why you're acting like I woke you up out of bed too early or something. I presume that because you mainly just write "diatribes" on audio forums, you don't even know any more what posting a meaningful, on-topic debate about audio looks like. And since you're clearly unable to defend your attacks against me, it's hard to see what you think all these "wrongs" are about, when just about everything that I wrote to E-Tim, closely follows just about everything you already believe in. Except maybe what I wrote about your company, which nevertheless, was far from an attack against it. But thanks for reminding me why I never liked you very much, Geoff. You're kind of a dick.
The sad fact is, we're on the same team, you idiot. You never could understand or at least appreciate that. Despite the fact that there are so few who are. OTOH, you have so many detractors on the audio forums, I guess that's why you can't even tell when someone's on your side any longer. That's assuming you ever could. And perhaps that explains why you're taking a page out of their book. For those would denounce your tweaks only respond with ad hominems, because guess what, they can't defend a thing they say either. In fact, I'm the only person I've ever seen defending your products on the internet, despite having never tried any of them. And I still did, even after knowing someone who has, who told me he couldn't hear a damn bit of difference from it.
Oh, and I finally had a brief look at your website back in Oct. Specifically the explanations for the products. I found it an amusing read, because they were full of "wrongs". You did your best, thats what counts! AFAIC, we're all at different levels of understanding with this, but that's ok. If I suggested you might be wrong in your explanations, and you might not quite understand how they function, that doesn't mean I think you're selling snake oil you don't believe in. Even if, as it appears at times from reading certain things in your stated explanations, I understand the principles behind some of those products better than you do, it doesn't mean they're not effective. Nor do I think how they work should matter to the end user. Only --if-- they work. I still give you credit for them (though not for the ideas you ripped off from PWB obviously - even if you had their approval). And I'm sure I would have no trouble hearing changes wrought by any of them, if I had them before me. Especially the tweak with the springs under the platform base, since I was toying with sh*t like that some 25 years ago.
I only posted something here to see if I could breath some life back into this hidden old haunt; maybe rustle up a good debate or two. But nothing doing. Only ghosts and derelicts. NASA scientists who can't for the life of them, post anything more intelligent or compelling than what you might expect from a 14 yr old girl from the San Fernando valley. Frankly, I don't know why you ever bother posting anything at all on these forums, when you never seem to have anything of note to say about anything, beyond your usual muddled one-liners. I don't know, but if you can't or won't advance the audio debate, does it not occur to you that shutting up can also be an option? Well, "Whatever" Geoff, as you say. You can go ahead and die on your dead sub-forum created and named in your honor, and talk to the crickets in the meanwhile. Fret not, I won't be back this way again. And yes, you can go ahead and call --this-- a "diatribe'. But at the very least, you should be able to see the difference now.
Hope you feel better after another of your pointless diatribes.
.
Nt
David, hope you enjoyed your vacation.
That was quite the response to a tongue-in-cheek satire post. I don't know if you are being serious or not for some of the following reasons.
1) You can open a hard drive and mark the edges without ruining the data on the drive.
2) You do know that hard drives do not use a laser (light) for read/write heads like optical drives do ?
3) Do you really understand how binary data works (e.g. CRCs and parity checks)? There are no fractions of a bit, the data is either read correctly or is isn't (no extra special sauce). A bit perfect-rip is a bit-perfect rip. If it wasn't, no mass produced software would ever work the same.
I must admit, your gift at satire is much better than mine.
The problem arises when one uses violet/purple pen to mark the outside of the disc. Unlike the color green or turquoise VIOLET is a color that is unrelated to how the laser reads the discs. I.e., violet is not a complementary color of red. Make of that what you will. Another anomaly worth mentioning is the color RED a works on Mercury Living Presence CDs that have white and black labels. The color Green doesn't work on those discs. By the way to confuse things even more the CD laser isn't really RED, it's infrared - invisible.
Edits: 10/14/21
***David, hope you enjoyed your vacation.***
Thanks Tim. I honestly can't recommend that anyone visit North Korea, and spend time in a North Korean prison for 7 years. But at least I was fed better than the average citizen of the country. Who knew that pissing on a poster of Kim Jong Un would land me in prison? It's not like I did so on purpose. Nature called, I responded, and his damn pudgy face is everywhere in Pyongyang! Anyway.
***I don't know if you are being serious or not for some of the following reasons.***
Well I said I was being serious, and I was serious about being serious! I wasn't completely sure if you were being facetious myself, since I don't recognize your name from way back when I was on this board. I read a few more of your posts later, and that confirmed it. No matter. I felt I needed to set the record straight on greening, and the like. Not just for your edification, but for the internet's. There is so much misinformation about this on the audio boards, I'm sick of it. Thirty years is enough! Also, this place is like Tumbleweed Junction. I don't think post titles are going to do it, to get a good debate going.
If skeptics want to ridicule these practices, I can't stop that. And I wouldn't want to, because as far as I can see, it's the only thing they live for. It would be a sad sad world for many such audio geeks, if they had nothing and no one to ridicule. But all I ask is they practice intellectual honesty, and at least attempt to understand the principles behind the tweaks and attack those, instead of propping up strawmen! Unfortunately, I'm one of the few people in the world, who at least has some fundamental understanding of how edge treatment actually works. And that's sad in itself.
***1) You can open a hard drive and mark the edges without ruining the data on the drive.***
And I quote: "To clean the hard drive platters, it's not as easy as some people think: just need to open the hard drives and get the platters out and then clean them. ".
https://www.dolphindatalab.com/how-to-clean-hard-drive-platters-and-recover-lost-data/
Data recovery labs may be able to get away with it, but the average user, short of building a special "clean room" in his home, should not even be thinking about doing this. Even if you can get into the hard drive, which are usually permanently sealed, you're not likely going to be able to remove the platters from the drive mechanism, without breaking something. I have repaired HD's when my data was at risk; but only by replacing the circuit board from an identical unit. But if you've actually removed an HD platter without destroying anything, feel free to detail here how you did that!
Even if you could do that, it's still a fool move in my opinion, because you simply don't need to, to tweak the HD. You're speaking to someone who actually -did- tweak his hard drive (years ago), to improve the sound of his audio. Successfully, so. In fact, I may be the only person who did, as I haven't read of anyone else doing it. Obviously not with edge treatment tweaks, but with a nifty little tweak called "Silver Rainbow Foil", from "P.W.B. Electronics Inc.". It was a lot easier than grabbing a chisel and a hammer and praying to the data Gods to help me not destroy 2 terabytes of data with my latest foray into follydom. It was just a matter of sticking a piece of this adhesive foil on to a certain location on the drive.
"But that's foolish! That can't have any effect on the spinning of the platters or the bits being read off of them! Don't you know anything about how hard drives work?!!".
Again, it's not supposed to. It's supposed to have an advantageous effect on the drive's energy patterns. Before you consider that's nonsense, consider this: Professional audio critics who were at least as skeptical as -you- are on this board, heard the effects of Silver Rainbow Foil. I haven't compared the two, but academically, I would argue that this would be more effective than greening the edge of the drive's platter. Because if you "treat" an object successfully, it's energy patterns transmit to everything it contains. This means you've treated all platters at once within the drive, by treating its exterior. That's why I consider your platter treatment idea (even if it wasn't meant to be serious), an amateur move.
So what's stopping you from not being facetious, and messing with advanced audio concepts? I know you're not going to buy $80k tweaks (nor am I...- I think $3k is my cut-off point...-.), but are you open minded, or afraid to include unverified science in your library of knowledge of the world we live in? If this world really did adhere to everything that the relatively small Western scientific community researched and eventually agreed upon...- you know, it would look very different than what it does now. But that's just not how science works.
*** 2) You do know that hard drives do not use a laser (light) for read/write heads like optical drives do ? ***
Uh, yeah, and I mentioned that the green pen tweak has no effect on data (whether read by optical lasers or magnetic heads); ergo, not relevant.
*** 3) Do you really understand how binary data works (e.g. CRCs and parity checks)? There are no fractions of a bit, the data is either read correctly or is isn't (no extra special sauce). A bit perfect-rip is a bit-perfect rip. If it wasn't, no mass produced software would ever work the same. ***
Aka the "Bits is bits" argument. Which I've been debating online with people like you for about 3 decades now. But I can see that I wasn't clear when I laughed at your idea that you can make CD rips that sound exactly the same. There are a lot of years and hundreds of tests in the digital domain behind that scoff, and you're not going to understand it from where I'm sitting. Trust me, it would suit me just fine if that were true. But it's not been my experience. Not when ripping CD's, not when playing them, not when even copying mp3 files. In fact, in years past, I posted examples of this on boards and my website, for people to make up their own minds by seeing if they hear differences between the files. When I started working with music files, I observed how every ripping program produced a different sounding result; all else being equal. How every software music player sounded different. How copies of CD's sounded different (I have -never- copied a commercial CD with both sounding equal). And yes, I've already heard the "software won't work argument" you gave, many times.
Later experiments showed how changes could be heard in copies of mp3 files; and still later experiments, included showing how just naming the files (with specific names), might change their sound. So there's things going on here well beyond "bits", or the usual theories of self-delusion to explain what doesn't fit in a skeptic's ideology. It's the same debates around reproducing music. Those who hear differences not explained by those who argue you can't hear anything beyond what they can measure, can only point to the limitations of technical measures. IOW, just because you can look at the data on a bit level, does not mean that's the only thing responsible for the very complex process (as in more complex than you know), of listening to music from a digital source.
For example...-. I know for a fact that when I make any improvements to my home audio system, whether the mods are based on advanced audio concepts or traditional ones, those improvements show up on my computer, my cell phone, and all other systems that play music. Am I going to flip through my old science texts, see if what I was taught includes that possibility, not find any answers there, and then go "Oh, then the fallback placebo theory must explain this??". No. Because I know my sound -very well-. And I can hear the very same characteristics that were improved on the home stereo, show up on all other devices in my home. The bits remain the same, the sound changes nevertheless. So what's really changing? To start with, the -ability to perceive sound- has changed.
Skeptics always try to understand this in direct terms, because obviously, that's easier for them. If you even want to understand advanced concepts in audio, then you should know t's much more difficult to try to understand what causal effects there may be to consider (without resorting to banal cop-outs like Occam's Razor). ie. The energy fields I was talking about having an effect on -everything-, does include the digital domain. I've experienced this in many ways. If I could measure them, the discussion about its effects would be over. But I don't know how to measure them with instruments, only by careful listening evaluations. I know from years past, that whenever I upload mp3 files to a website for later download, the sound has degraded - every damn time. The website isn't compressing the file or anything. And if I was prone to deluding myself, then it stands to reason my delusion would be to have the sound improve. Because I need it to not change in quality, if I'm going to use it to demonstrate 'energy field effects' to people.
This is one of many reasons why I laugh and roll my eyes when I still hear people arguing "bits is bits!".
Would you be willing to advance the statements concerning what particular CD/DVD burn programs sound the best... or @ least better?
Kind Regards,
Ken
The Mind has No Firewall~ U.S. Army War College.
Sorry Ken for the late reply, and the fact that I won't be of much help here, as my last experiences in testing CD burning and music playing programs for computers was ages ago. I can't remember the last time I even burned a CD. I do recall "EAC" (Exact Audio Copy) (for Windows) was one of the best burning programs at the time. If only for the reason that you could configure highly advanced settings for burning and ripping, that other such 'apps' did not have.
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: