Planar Speaker Asylum

Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

RE: Here you go

Posted by Davey on June 22, 2017 at 06:59:41:
Yeah, there's no doubt that was his objective. However, with this type of large/hybrid speaker it's not really achievable anyway. I prefer to have crossover regions sum correctly with the selected filter slopes regardless of whether it achieves a linear-phase result or not.

The woofer issue is something different. Ideally, the Peerless woofer would be electronically equalized at the low end without the weight modification and thus somewhat alleviating the cone resonance issue. However, that requires a different (non-conventional) approach to the whole scheme......which is still something that many audiophiles reject.

Cheers,

Dave.