LOL, you are partially correct but.....

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Precentage Thread Below - It's pretty obvious why your guys prefer Analog to Digital - Balance 08:29:26 12/04/05 (47)

Re: Precentage Thread Below - It's pretty obvious why your guys prefer Analog to Digital - Queg 12:08:52 12/05/05 (0)

Re: Precentage Thread Below - It's pretty obvious why your guys prefer Analog to Digital - John Elison 06:29:56 12/05/05 (2)

To each his own! nt - risabet 18:20:24 12/05/05 (1)

There ya go! (nt) - John Elison 21:52:27 12/05/05 (0)

My best-ever digital system cost way less than $1K - Dave Pogue 06:06:14 12/05/05 (0)

Re: Precentage Thread Below - It's pretty obvious why your guys prefer Analog to Digital - Evil Seav 20:30:26 12/04/05 (0)

To me, my analog vs my digital is a toss up... - NewStevo 20:16:18 12/04/05 (0)

not really - OMalley 16:49:38 12/04/05 (0)

I've had the opportunity to test digital gear... - EdAInWestOC 16:41:33 12/04/05 (0)

Why I dumped $$$ into analog vs. digital. - Supernaught 16:37:45 12/04/05 (0)

Some of have compared more expensive digital front-ends to our analog front ends - rlindsa 15:54:19 12/04/05 (0)

Actually it's pretty obvious that you didn't read the entire thread! - Ray-o-Stat 14:30:09 12/04/05 (0)

a great number of CDPs are disposable. - hifitommy 13:24:06 12/04/05 (0)

Re: Precentage Thread Below - It's pretty obvious why your guys prefer Analog to Digital - CAFC 11:43:45 12/04/05 (0)

I went up to $3500 digital front end, with SACD, still analog is better. - jdaniel 10:43:15 12/04/05 (0)

Your premise is flawed to start with, but . . . - HenryH 10:11:32 12/04/05 (7)

wrong on all counts - redneckaudio 12:17:20 12/04/05 (0)

So your basically saying that to better Digital you need thousands spent on Vinyl, (n/t) - Balance 12:04:27 12/04/05 (5)

No. Read my post again. . . if trolls can read, which I doubt. /nt\ - HenryH 12:43:20 12/04/05 (1)

By attacking "trolls" are you really saying "stay out of this site"? - lpspinner 08:07:46 12/05/05 (0)

Re: So your basically saying that to better Digital you need thousands spent on Vinyl, (n/t) - CAFC 12:13:59 12/04/05 (2)

I'm thinking the same thing. /nt\ - HenryH 12:43:58 12/04/05 (1)

Not true. Also Henry, you add nothing to this thread - Balance 22:35:32 12/04/05 (0)

You have the cart before the horse - - kavakidd 08:58:01 12/04/05 (8)

Yep... - JoeLip 21:44:11 12/04/05 (2)

Re: Yep... - kavakidd 21:56:08 12/04/05 (1)

Re: Yep... - JoeLip 12:11:38 12/05/05 (0)

Exactly! Also, quite a few of the "nuts" here don't have all that much tied up in our analog systems. - Dick Schneiders 11:49:12 12/04/05 (3)

No question - many inexpensive analog systems - kavakidd 20:06:15 12/04/05 (1)

Yes, sorry, I meant the original poster when I said "you". (n/t) - Dick Schneiders 03:52:08 12/05/05 (0)

Re: Exactly! Also, quite a few of the "nuts" here don't have all that much tied up in our analog systems. - fdrennen 12:05:36 12/04/05 (0)

You present a very good point of view that I never thought of and..... - Balance 10:06:27 12/04/05 (0)

This thread was dedicated to those ONLY who have a fraction spent on Digital compared to Analog. - Balance 08:53:37 12/04/05 (1)

Sure they can ... - reelsmith. 08:58:47 12/04/05 (0)

Re: Precentage Thread Below - It's pretty obvious why your guys prefer Analog to Digital - mosin 08:49:53 12/04/05 (1)

ditto - redneckaudio 12:18:52 12/04/05 (0)

No ... - reelsmith. 08:45:33 12/04/05 (2)

Okay, then you have a right to speak, but the others, C'MON! (n/t) - Balance 08:51:00 12/04/05 (1)

But your TT is far more expensive than your CDP (nt) - Supernaught 16:45:40 12/04/05 (0)

It's pretty obvious where you're going with this - Bersani 08:44:59 12/04/05 (7)

LOL, you are partially correct but..... - Balance 08:49:38 12/04/05 (6)

Re: LOL, you are partially correct but..... - Bersani 09:04:03 12/04/05 (0)

Here's how it happened. - mosin 08:58:20 12/04/05 (4)

What if it happened differently? - John Elison 22:24:01 12/05/05 (0)

Re: Here's how it happened. - 33 1/3 13:34:23 12/04/05 (0)

Yup. - Bry 11:05:32 12/04/05 (1)

me too - OMalley 19:25:45 12/04/05 (0)

Follow Ups

LOL, you are partially correct but..... - Balance 08:49:38 12/04/05 (6)

Re: LOL, you are partially correct but..... - Bersani 09:04:03 12/04/05 (0)

Here's how it happened. - mosin 08:58:20 12/04/05 (4)

What if it happened differently? - John Elison 22:24:01 12/05/05 (0)

Re: Here's how it happened. - 33 1/3 13:34:23 12/04/05 (0)

Yup. - Bry 11:05:32 12/04/05 (1)

me too - OMalley 19:25:45 12/04/05 (0)

69.198.90.199