![]() |
Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
Do these make any sense to people? Symoposium suggest metal is a better conductor of energy then rubber (true) so their aluminum coupling blocks provide a great way to drain energy from the chassis of a component. But energy travels in the opposite direction too (shelf to component). So are these blocks only good if you have a comletely inert, resonant-free shelf? What confuses and irritates me most is that Symposium suggest that rubber/foam does work well as feet because they absorb energy, not transmit it.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Symposium Coupling blocks - Len_ 14:14:08 02/17/04 (9)
- Re: Symposium Coupling blocks - David Aiken 23:19:50 02/17/04 (6)
- Symposium's concept revisited - Len_ 10:00:44 02/18/04 (5)
- Re: Symposium's concept revisited - GaryAR 13:58:50 02/18/04 (0)
- Re: Symposium's concept revisited - David Aiken 12:37:32 02/18/04 (1)
- Re: Symposium's concept revisited - Len_ 13:29:28 02/18/04 (0)
- Question for you about Granite - thefeds15@yahoo.com 10:50:49 02/18/04 (1)
- Re: Question for you about Granite - Len_ 12:23:49 02/18/04 (0)
- Re: Symposium Coupling blocks - Schilke B1 17:02:36 02/17/04 (1)
- Re: Symposium Coupling blocks - jkwinn 20:11:58 02/17/04 (0)