Re: Transformer-based passive pre, biamp with active XO, need impedance help please

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Transformer-based passive pre, biamp with active XO, need impedance help please - Saurav 09:08:35 04/01/02 (33)

Re: Transformer-based passive pre, biamp with active XO, need impedance help please - the_neighbor 13:42:11 04/11/02 (0)

Re: Transformer-based passive pre, biamp with active XO, need impedance help please - Joseph Lau 02:08:22 04/02/02 (3)

Have you tried the low-resistance attenuator? - KCHANG 07:36:17 04/02/02 (2)

Silver Rock transformer att. vs. 1 k resistor shunt attenuator - Arbelos 14:51:36 04/06/02 (1)

Re: Silver Rock transformer att. vs. 1 k resistor shunt attenuator - the_neighbor 13:33:08 04/11/02 (0)

Transformer-based volume control v. low-resistence attenuator? - KCHANG 14:33:10 04/01/02 (23)

Re: Transformer-based volume control v. low-resistence attenuator? - dave slagle 20:34:34 04/01/02 (20)

But how about wire-wound resistors? How does your argument apply to that case?(NT) - KCHANG 08:56:43 04/02/02 (17)

Re: But how about wire-wound resistors? How does your argument apply to that case?(NT) - dave slagle 10:01:22 04/02/02 (16)

Re: But how about wire-wound resistors? How does your argument apply to that case?(NT) - Steve Eddy 13:28:12 04/02/02 (15)

Re: But how about wire-wound resistors? How does your argument apply to that case?(NT) - dave slagle 15:12:06 04/02/02 (14)

Re: But how about wire-wound resistors? How does your argument apply to that case?(NT) - Steve Eddy 19:19:50 04/02/02 (13)

Re: But how about wire-wound resistors? How does your argument apply to that case?(NT) - dave slagle 20:19:40 04/02/02 (12)

Re: But how about wire-wound resistors? How does your argument apply to that case?(NT) - Steve Eddy 21:47:58 04/02/02 (11)

Re: But how about wire-wound resistors? How does your argument apply to that case?(NT) - dave slagle 08:03:41 04/03/02 (10)

Re: But how about wire-wound resistors? How does your argument apply to that case?(NT) - Steve Eddy 11:11:55 04/03/02 (9)

Re: But how about wire-wound resistors? How does your argument apply to that case?(NT) - Jon Risch 17:43:22 04/04/02 (5)

Re: But how about wire-wound resistors? How does your argument apply to that case?(NT) - Steve Eddy 19:19:15 04/04/02 (4)

Re: But how about wire-wound resistors? How does your argument apply to that case?(NT) - dave slagle 15:00:46 04/05/02 (3)

Re: But how about wire-wound resistors? How does your argument apply to that case?(NT) - Steve Eddy 09:56:32 04/06/02 (2)

Re: But how about wire-wound resistors? How does your argument apply to that case?(NT) - dave slagle 20:14:47 04/06/02 (1)

Re: But how about wire-wound resistors? How does your argument apply to that case?(NT) - Steve Eddy 22:51:41 04/06/02 (0)

Re: But how about wire-wound resistors? How does your argument apply to that case?(NT) - dave slagle 13:15:17 04/03/02 (2)

Re: But how about wire-wound resistors? How does your argument apply to that case?(NT) - Steve Eddy 19:29:23 04/03/02 (1)

Re: But how about wire-wound resistors? How does your argument apply to that case?(NT) - dave slagle 07:22:54 04/04/02 (0)

That's a real good and interesting point. - Kurt Strain 08:10:03 04/02/02 (1)

Re: That's a real good and interesting point. - dave slagle 08:18:54 04/02/02 (0)

Re: Transformer-based volume control v. low-resistence attenuator? - Kurt Strain 15:03:50 04/01/02 (0)

Re: Transformer-based volume control v. low-resistence attenuator? - Saurav 14:44:24 04/01/02 (0)

Re: Transformer-based passive pre, biamp with active XO, need impedance help please - Steve Eddy 12:20:02 04/01/02 (3)

Re: Transformer-based passive pre, biamp with active XO, need impedance help please - Saurav 13:05:52 04/01/02 (2)

Re: Transformer-based passive pre, biamp with active XO, need impedance help please - Steve Eddy 13:43:55 04/01/02 (1)

Re: Transformer-based passive pre, biamp with active XO, need impedance help please - Saurav 13:53:52 04/01/02 (0)

Follow Ups

Re: Transformer-based passive pre, biamp with active XO, need impedance help please - the_neighbor 13:42:11 04/11/02 (0)

207.18.199.151