![]() |
Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: Re: Wait a little longer for posted by Jon L on March 21, 2005 at 18:21:03:
If I remember what Steve said, it is an attempt to have the best of passive and active designs. Something like, transformer-coupled phase-splitter-->shunt-type resistor volume control-->Fet buffer stage.Ah, ok. I started down that path about 15 years ago with the AL-1, which Corey Greenberg based his Aunt Corey's Buffered Passive Preamp on. Though the AL-1 didn't use an input transformer and the output was an integrated circuit buffer (a PMI BUF-03).
It's evolved a bit since then with the addition of an input transformer and a switch from an IC output buffer to a discrete one. The current version uses a single-ended hybrid tube/bipolar follower.
It's currently driving a little flea-powered amp that uses the same basic topology but with a 1:8 step-up transformer for fully passive voltage gain.
Anyway, glad to see that this basic approach has worked well for others. It's worked quite well for me over the years.
se
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Wait a little longer for - Steve Eddy 19:45:20 03/21/05 (3)
- Why the input transformer? - KCHANG 13:58:30 03/23/05 (2)
- Re: Why the input transformer? - Steve Eddy 19:15:21 03/23/05 (1)
- Re: Why the input transformer? - KCHANG 22:28:20 03/23/05 (0)