Topic - Positive-Feedback Review on the QuickSilver contact enhancer - Rpatrick 15:39:17 02/27/05 (15)

• Re: Positive-Feedback Review on the QuickSilver contact enhancer - Az Barber 16:51:23 02/27/05 (14)
• I saw the "test" results and the criteria for the test. Hardly scientific/credible. - Jack Seaton 18:11:24 02/27/05 (6)
• Subjective/Objective - jbmcb 05:51:43 02/28/05 (5)
• Say what you want.. - faithnomorefreak 12:42:46 02/28/05 (3)
• Your eyes don't lie - badman 16:38:01 03/01/05 (2)
• "Your eyes trick you just like your ears. Human perceptions aren't perfect, none of them. " You are wrong, period. - Jack Seaton 18:14:30 03/04/05 (1)
• Excuse me? - badman 13:04:33 03/08/05 (0)
• My "First hand" experience is that Quick Silver takes a minimum of 36 hours break in, which this gentleman failed ... - Jack Seaton 07:02:28 02/28/05 (0)
• Re: Positive-Feedback Review on the QuickSilver contact enhancer - Rpatrick 17:41:01 02/27/05 (6)
• wow, that makes 18 posts from you about this stuff - some young guy 18:04:54 02/27/05 (5)
• Re: wow, that makes 18 posts from you about this stuff - Lynn 06:12:31 02/28/05 (4)
• Re-registered under a different name! - Rpatrick 12:56:43 02/28/05 (0)
• Re: wow, that makes 18 posts from you about this stuff - Jack Seaton 07:04:17 02/28/05 (2)
• Irrational Exhuberance? - jbmcb 08:04:49 02/28/05 (1)
• MY FEELINGS ABOUT RPATRICK - faithnomorefreak 12:46:01 02/28/05 (0)
• wow, that makes 18 posts from you about this stuff - some young guy 18:03:08 02/27/05 (0)