In Reply to: Why didn't you set up up the review for a Stratus Gold instead of putting it under the Gold-i????? posted by Pat D on April 17, 2007 at 19:07:51:
Remember the Gold was highly reviewed and recommended component, a best seller and a magazine darling in exactly the same way as the "i" version.The Gold "i" looks identical, was priced similarly, carried the same name (PSB Stratus Gold) and is the same old design with some improvements.
Those who want to comment on how much better the "i" version sounds probably should do so.
But as far as starting a new product listing goes - I don't think we need a new listing for every version of every component ever made. Do you?
Looking through the Stratus Gold i section a least a couple of the reviews refer to the speakers as Golds and the rest refer to them as Gold i's. I made it clear this is a review of the Gold not the Gold i and I've got a feeling that's a heck of alot more than some others are doing - not just in the PSB section but everywhere else people post reviews as well.
Give me rhythm or give me death!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Why? It's still the PSB Stratus Gold they are both a 16 year old design! - Don T 20:05:51 04/17/07 (3)
- Well, it's a different box for starters. - Pat D 19:47:13 04/18/07 (0)
- Re: Why? It's still the PSB Stratus Gold they are both a 16 year old design! - RGA 06:46:09 04/18/07 (0)
- I have heard the Gold i, it's just like you describe....(NT) - Ozzy 01:56:13 04/18/07 (0)