In Reply to: Here's the GR Research data.... posted by jonbee on April 12, 2007 at 12:17:06:
What about measurements after 10 minutes?what about measurements after 1 hour?
what about measurements after 2 hours?
what about measurements after 5 hours?
Given the ridiculous gap between 10 seconds to 20 hours, there's no reason to trust the methodology used for this test
Of course all the measurements are close, so there's no way you could simply look at the numbers and declare exactly what parameter changes would be audible, and what changes would not be audible.
.
.
.
Richard BassNut Greene
Subjective Audiophile 2007
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Dumbest test ever! (10 seconds break in ... compared with 20 hours break-in!) - Richard BassNut Greene 07:31:21 04/13/07 (9)
- Really? - Danny 10:55:32 04/14/07 (2)
- Changes in driver parameters only SUGGEST changes in frequency response that COULD be audible by SOME people - Richard BassNut Greene 07:34:20 04/17/07 (1)
- Hilarious - Danny 16:28:39 04/18/07 (0)
- I think you should read the whole thing... - jonbee 08:15:40 04/13/07 (5)
- I read the whole thing... - Guth 11:23:22 04/13/07 (4)
- Here's the connection: the electrical parameters interact with the xovers... - jonbee 13:00:32 04/13/07 (3)
- Re: Here's the connection: the electrical parameters interact with the xovers... - Guth 13:59:01 04/13/07 (2)
- Only your own ears can tell you that. (nt) - jonbee 15:23:21 04/13/07 (1)
- Which pretty much brings us back to square one. - Guth 16:26:49 04/13/07 (0)