In Reply to: Hey Mikes! CCD, actually . . . posted by Frank P on September 30, 2003 at 07:22:27:
If you think the 30mm tweeter is expensive, wait to you see how much the 50mm midrange will cost!!>However, that said, Mikenificant1, you might want to think about >rather than investing $15,000 in a tweeter for the CE-1s (which may >be be easy to re-sell), going with a pair of Midis - just a thought!
Yes but the Midi-Grand's with the Diamond Tweeter and Enigma would cost about $63K. That is out of my price range right now. FYI, before Bill, a friend of mine was the distributor for Kharma and he had the speakers I own, and then upgraded to the Exquisite 1A when they became available, (with the rest of the system exactly the same, so I know how they compare because I heard both). To this day he still prefers the CE1.0 SE overall. To me the Exquisite was much smoother, and the bass was better, had more resolution, but the midrange was really not much better (it's as good as it gets on both), and the imaging and soundstaging was superior on the 1.0 SE's (due to either the wider cabinet or the large mid of the Exquisite I guess). If I were to get the Diamond Tweeter the only difference between the MGC 1.0D and the CRM1.2D (1.0 SE = CRM1.2) would be the midrange driver, everything else would be the same (except for the Enigma upgrade and the slightly larger cabinet of the MGC1.0). Don't get me wrong, if I could get the MGRC1.0 Diamond I would, but I think the CRM1.2Diamond would be better than the standard MidiGrand, and definitely the best bang for the buck. I’m hoping Diamonds are an audiophile's best friend! We’ll see.
Mike
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Hey Mikes! CCD, actually . . . - Mikenificent1 09:44:30 09/30/03 (4)
- Re: Hey Mikes! CCD, actually . . . - Frank P 10:54:30 09/30/03 (3)
- Re: Hey Mikes! CCD, actually . . . - sirius 07:31:54 10/01/03 (2)
- Re: Hey Mikes! CCD, actually . . . - Frank P 08:37:37 10/01/03 (1)
- Re: Hey Mikes! CCD, actually . . . - Mikenificent1 03:03:13 10/02/03 (0)