In Reply to: Re: Creative Improvised Music Projects (CIMP) posted by jazz1 on November 22, 2002 at 00:19:00:
"I don't think we should promote CIMP as a source for audiophile recordings"If by "we" you mean yourself and applejack, I agree. If by "we" you mean anyone, I disagree! I certainly don't understand your stance on CIMP (nor your stance on Hat Art - Hatology might be properly called an audiophile label but sister Hat Art? I think even Werner and Pia would be surprised - but pleased!) but I certainly have no issue with YOU promoting or not what you please.
CIMP is indeed an audiophile label, regardless of your (or my) opinion on the subject and I will continue to promote it as the best I've heard. I recommend it to anyone with a love of adventurous music who also love excellent live sound.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Creative Improvised Music Projects (CIMP) - D 09:54:16 11/23/02 (0)