|
Music Lane It's all about the music, dude! Sit down, relax and listen to some tunes. |
|
|
|
Music Lane It's all about the music, dude! Sit down, relax and listen to some tunes. |
|
In Reply to: SACD not likely posted by DWPC on November 20, 2002 at 16:09:06:
I felt like you do until I read some posts on Hi REz from a guy who sold his expensive Cary CDP and went to cheaper Sony multi format SACD player.I compared a cheaper Sony multi SACD head to head with a Mac about 4 times more expensive on CD and liked the Sony better. I guess there's no comparison as to build quality and longevity, but the Mac should have sounded better. Neither are as good as the 9000ES I got. I heard the difference in SACD right away on the sampler. Sounded like very decent analog. A bit variable on different recordings though, I have to admit. Good reason for asylum members to give some reviews on SACDs.
Hey, I resent purchasing discs in another format. Thing is, they do sound better. Pays yer money and tikes yer chice. Agree about multi-channel.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: SACD not likely - edta 15:06:00 11/21/02 (0)
- Re: SACD not likely - TOOL 17:40:14 11/21/02 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
