In Reply to: **WRONG WRONG **DING DONG** WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG posted by Newey on October 29, 2015 at 20:45:49:
What do you mean by that?You're elevating one group of critics (the enemy) by ignoring their more prescient and insightful peers in order to fancy yourself the savior of Romantic/post-Romantic Art?
That's sick.
There are--and were--plenty of "academics" who are and were quite fond and supportive of artists of those eras.*
And there were plenty of critics who weren't.
And there were some critics who evolved over their lifetimes.
*Based upon your previous behavior, you were worth three examples this morning.
Edits: 10/29/15
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- "It's staggering to consider that nobody's ever challenged that academic view. EXCEPT ME." - jdaniel@jps.net 21:06:20 10/29/15 (7)
- Your Knowledge Of Critical & Academic 20th Cent Trends - Newey 22:40:11 10/29/15 (6)
- Sigh. You said, "EXCEPT ME." (Your caps.) Really? Except you? - jdaniel@jps.net 07:48:18 10/30/15 (5)
- This Is Like Teaching A Slow Learner - Newey 20:00:26 10/30/15 (1)
- Indeed.... - jdaniel@jps.net 07:20:03 10/31/15 (0)
- You Sound Just Like A Holocaust Denier - Newey 19:23:49 10/30/15 (2)
- This Thread Is No Longer Constructive - Shuting it Down - No Further Posts Coming - Newey 19:49:48 10/30/15 (1)
- Could you be a dear and identify this tune for me? I just can't put my finger on it - jdaniel@jps.net 01:10:42 10/31/15 (0)