In Reply to: "Fruit fly posts" Effeminization of discretion and good taste; let it stand. posted by jdaniel@jps.net on October 29, 2015 at 08:55:48:
>>"Fruit fly posts" Effeminization of discretion and good taste;<<
>>Classic ad hominem. Not the behaviour of someone who is confident in his claims/arguments.<<
WHAT AD HOMINEM attack?????????????
Listen, homeboy. If I want to attack you, I'll come at you with full force. You'll know it; no question about it, no secret codey weasel words.
Das how I roll -- you feel me -- Homes?
What part of my post was some feminized ad hominem attack? Fly? Insect? The image of an flying insect - the common fly being the most common type - harrassing a human, or any large animal further up the food chain - has been used as a metaphor for trivial irritants since the DAWN OF HUMANITY!!!
Fruit flies, and all flies, as with most animals on the planet, come in male and female pairs. How is using a flying insect analogy "effeminization"??????? Are insects now considered to be all females???
If so, I've got a rude awakening for you, Jiminy. Cockroaches reproduce in the billions. They can only do that with male and female pairs.
Is this all news to you? Is basic biology something unknown to you? Are you even aware of the addage "...the birds and the bees..."?
Jeez, this place sure attracts a lot of abberant types. Insects = feminization. Unbelievable.
Apparently, to YOU, a fruit fly means something else. If so, whatever the **k it means, it's local to your little circle of whomever you call your associates. I can assure you that I used the analogy to indicate a flying, buzzing, trivial irritant -----NOT SOMETHING ELSE -- whatever YOU may think it may be.
********************BUT*******************
That's not the end of the story. We're not done yet.
YOU - the apparent innocent, pure-as-driven-snow victum of insect insults, actually fired the first shot of a REAL ad hominem attack, and you did it in a greasy loser kind of way, when you weakly tried to deflect away the attention from your lack of grasp of Beethoven's cannon by alleging that I collect boxed sets, and as such, I was a neophite.
http://www.audioasylum.com/audio/music/messages/21/217375.html
What's good for the goose is good for the gander. Or - does that also have some other weird ad hominem meaning for you?
Severius! Supremus Invictus
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- **There Is NO *Repeat* NO ad hominem Attack Implied, Intended, or Expressed - Newey 20:34:28 10/29/15 (7)
- Then & Now - Is JDaniels The New Rob? - Newey 20:38:55 10/29/15 (2)
- What have you said that's correct? - jdaniel@jps.net 21:54:28 10/29/15 (1)
- Yep - Super Ultra Correct - Newey 23:19:44 10/29/15 (0)
- Fine, just how 'bout less Newey and more Cui from now on? nt - jdaniel@jps.net 20:37:49 10/29/15 (3)
- Ceasar Cui? [ nt] - Newey 20:49:45 10/29/15 (2)
- Yes, Newey, no one doubts that you know who Cesar Cui is. - jdaniel@jps.net 21:36:39 10/29/15 (1)
- The Irony Is - I'm Not "Trying" At All - Newey 19:10:26 10/30/15 (0)