This has been somewhat discussed over on Google Groups (RMCR), but the Chopin Competition did release (a couple of days ago) the scores and ratings of each of the competitors by each judge in each round of the competition. If we look at the final round, we see that each juror could rate each of the finalists on a scale of 1 to 10 (10 being the highest, i.e., first prize). Of all the finalists, Katie got the largest number (3) of 10's (first place votes), but she only got third prize.
So what happened? It turned out that a couple of the jurors rated her very low - two jurors in particular: Akiko Ebi from Japan, and MARTHA ARGERICH from Argentina (now Switzerland). I hate to say it, Martha, but you really blew it on this one! Any more decisions like this and folks are going to take away your "Tigress" credentials! ;-)
Seriously though, it's very interesting seeing what a wide divergence there was among the jury members with the different competitors. It reinforces what that British critic that they interviewed said: why shouldn't critics disagree with the judges decisions? After all, the judges can't even agree among themselves! ;-)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Why Katie Liu did not win the Chopin Competition - Chris from Lafayette 00:38:53 10/27/15 (26)
- RE: Why Katie Liu did not win the Chopin Competition - Bill the K 06:47:59 10/29/15 (1)
- Thanks, Bill - yeah, she would have needed help from a couple of other judges too [nt] ;-) - Chris from Lafayette 09:49:54 10/29/15 (0)
- RE: Why Katie Liu did not win the Chopin Competition - DrChaos 00:45:30 10/28/15 (1)
- Thanks - Per my post below, no argument about that. . . - Chris from Lafayette 01:20:54 10/28/15 (0)
- It's So Subjective.......... - Todd Krieger 15:30:14 10/27/15 (9)
- As is your criticism .... - Amphissa 17:35:36 10/27/15 (8)
- Argerich and Ebi were hand-in-glove in their final round scores. . . - Chris from Lafayette 01:18:30 10/28/15 (7)
- RE: Argerich and Ebi were hand-in-glove in their final round scores. . . - Amphissa 01:31:52 10/28/15 (6)
- OK - sorry for the overkill! [nt] ;-) - Chris from Lafayette 01:39:06 10/28/15 (5)
- RE: OK - sorry for the overkill! [nt] ;-) - ahendler 14:56:20 10/28/15 (4)
- I've heard about judges who do that - Chris from Lafayette 00:41:10 10/29/15 (1)
- RE: I've heard about judges who do that - Ivan303 07:21:25 10/29/15 (0)
- Was Van Cliburn that good? - Ivan303 18:32:22 10/28/15 (1)
- RE: Was Van Cliburn that good? - ahendler 19:40:02 10/28/15 (0)
- Sniffles? - Jay Buridan 11:52:18 10/27/15 (3)
- I thought Polonaise was something you spread on your sandwich (sorry!) [nt] - Chris from Lafayette 14:39:39 10/27/15 (2)
- NOT SORRY ENOUGH! nt - John Marks 15:51:43 10/27/15 (1)
- The Polish version of Dijonnaise? - Chris from Lafayette 10:29:16 10/28/15 (0)
- RE: Why Katie Liu did not win the Chopin Competition - Amphissa 05:31:59 10/27/15 (7)
- RE: Why Katie Liu did not win the Chopin Competition - rbolaw 10:05:50 10/27/15 (0)
- Of course you're right - I was taking a bit of a "silliness" tack - Chris from Lafayette 10:00:21 10/27/15 (5)
- RE: Of course you're right - I was taking a bit of a "silliness" tack - Amphissa 16:11:59 10/27/15 (4)
- RE: Of course you're right - I was taking a bit of a "silliness" tack - David Smith 10:42:19 10/29/15 (0)
- Adam Harasiewicz, a previous winner, was a pretty successful performing artist too - Chris from Lafayette 00:29:07 10/28/15 (0)
- RE: Of course you're right - I was taking a bit of a "silliness" tack - rbolaw 16:27:46 10/27/15 (1)
- One juror they perhaps could have done without was John Rink - Chris from Lafayette 00:46:18 10/28/15 (0)