In Reply to: Well, not really... posted by Kas on October 28, 2011 at 13:21:23:
The truth is, there is no way I can blame critics for not being able to listen to a Hatto CD and say, "that's identical to Mr. X from 9 years ago, only 7 percent faster" (the Hatto CDs were speed manipulated). If they listened to many Hatto CDs, they should have been able to tell they used different pianos and recording venues, which is inconsistent with Hatto's story, but I can't blame them for not bothering to do that.
But accepting the ridiculous Hatto back story at face value was a pretty silly and ignorant thing to do. An old, frail, dying woman, or for that matter, a young, healthy man, is not going to be able to record the entire piano repertoire brilliantly in a handful of years. Or at least the critics should have been suspicious and looked more closely into the tales Hatto and her husband were telling.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Well, not really... - rbolaw 14:46:40 10/28/11 (9)
- "the Hatto CDs were speed manipulated" - Chris from Lafayette 23:23:19 10/28/11 (8)
- RE: "the Hatto CDs were speed manipulated" - rbolaw 12:31:23 10/29/11 (0)
- Had some filched CDs not been left alone, the fraud might not have come to light - John Marks 07:46:14 10/29/11 (6)
- RE: Had some filched CDs not been left alone, the fraud might not have come to light - rbolaw 12:25:25 10/29/11 (5)
- Well, at least one undoctored CD slipped into the stream of commerce, and the jig was well and truly up. - John Marks 11:33:44 10/30/11 (4)
- All true - rbolaw 13:39:01 10/30/11 (3)
- Look at Ivan Moravec's discography... That's more the norm. - John Marks 18:44:12 10/30/11 (2)
- Moravec/Schumann - pbarach 14:58:11 11/01/11 (0)
- Exactly. nt - rbolaw 12:11:36 10/31/11 (0)