In Reply to: Recently, I read a 2001 Hurwitz review of posted by jult52 on March 23, 2011 at 06:31:50:
I'm not sure why anyone should find Hurwitz's reviews objectionable. Sure, they can be pretty caustic, but there's no question of where he stands, and he almost always gives cogent reasons for his opinions. I may not agree with him - and I often don't - but he usually provides enough information for me to decide whether or not I want to pursue a particular recording, even one that he savages.
And he's right about the Lindsays :-).
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Recently, I read a 2001 Hurwitz review of - Kas 07:09:51 03/23/11 (8)
- he certainly missed the boat on this recording - Analog Scott 08:35:35 03/24/11 (3)
- Missed the boat?? - Kas 09:03:58 03/24/11 (2)
- A further thought. - Analog Scott 12:46:52 03/24/11 (0)
- yes he missed the boat. completely. And made an ass of himself - Analog Scott 09:42:37 03/24/11 (0)
- Agreed, for the most part - rbolaw 13:55:32 03/23/11 (0)
- The Lindsay Quartet's recordings - jult52 07:22:09 03/23/11 (2)
- RE: The Lindsay Quartet's recordings - jazz1 08:31:11 03/23/11 (1)
- jazz - jult52 09:43:19 03/23/11 (0)