In Reply to: Hatto in the Times posted by Paul_A on February 26, 2007 at 10:30:21:
In Gramophone
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Husband confesses - flyingdutchman 10:33:17 02/26/07 (22)
- Re: Husband confesses - tlyyra 17:48:47 02/26/07 (0)
- Looks like a bitter and cynical man getting his revenge - rbolaw 12:57:56 02/26/07 (0)
- He's full of shit. - D Harvey 11:29:15 02/26/07 (2)
- Indeed! "He feels that he has acted stupidly, dishonestly and unlawfully...." - musetap 12:25:10 02/26/07 (1)
- Your last point was one of the first to come to my mind. - D Harvey 13:42:41 02/26/07 (0)
- Re: - newyorkp7 11:22:19 02/26/07 (15)
- How did the pirated original CD's fare in their reviews? - docw 13:48:24 02/26/07 (0)
- {shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!}...N/T - musetap 12:26:48 02/26/07 (0)
- Hard to fault - markrohr 12:17:18 02/26/07 (12)
- But... - kerr 13:22:04 02/26/07 (10)
- Where do you find them saying the originals were "forgettable"? nt - clarkjohnsen 10:53:25 02/27/07 (3)
- Indirectly by the fact that the scam lasted as long as it did (nt) - kerr 11:47:19 02/27/07 (2)
- Absolutely right. If the recordings supposedly done by Hatto... - SE 03:32:49 02/28/07 (1)
- Yes, that was my point exactly! - kerr 09:22:08 03/01/07 (0)
- I think it was the high productivity and apparent versatility that impressed - Bambi B 10:52:38 02/27/07 (2)
- Re: I think it was the high productivity and apparent versatility that impressed - kerr 11:57:09 02/27/07 (1)
- "source of embarrassment to the music reviewers..." {shhhhhhhhhh....}...N/T - musetap 15:20:17 02/27/07 (0)
- Re: But... - geoff_j 18:35:26 02/26/07 (1)
- Re: But... - kerr 12:02:38 02/27/07 (0)
- An excellent question, though the answer is probably mundane. nt - markrohr 16:37:36 02/26/07 (0)
- Re: Hard to fault - newyorkp7 12:26:26 02/26/07 (0)
- Feh - Thornhill 10:54:55 02/26/07 (0)