And I've come to the realization that in spite of the new version and rave reviews, Nero **still** produces inferior-sounding copies, to my ears.....It's a dated Toshiba laptop. The burner came with the machine. I get the best results ripping with CDex, burning with Feurio. (I'd use Alcohol if it had a more-conventional file-by-file method of ripping and burning, as opposed to image files.)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Well, Burn Software Is Still Not Created Equal..... - Todd Krieger 19:03:02 03/11/07 (11)
- Rip with CDex, Burn with DART - Todd Krieger 11:50:00 03/12/07 (6)
- What about exact audio copy? - Bruce from DC 13:56:45 03/12/07 (5)
- Re: What about exact audio copy? - Todd Krieger 01:31:21 03/13/07 (4)
- Speaking of Exact Audio Copy..... - Todd Krieger 03:03:41 03/14/07 (2)
- Re: Speaking of Exact Audio Copy..... - PeAK 04:15:02 03/14/07 (1)
- Re: Speaking of Exact Audio Copy..... - Todd Krieger 22:57:45 03/14/07 (0)
- "...all these utilities produce files that seem identical as data, but they sound so different...." - Feanor 11:44:15 03/13/07 (0)
- The answer is - kavakidd 21:04:19 03/11/07 (0)
- Nero does sound bad - mattcecil1@yahoo.com 20:31:26 03/11/07 (0)
- Re: Well, Burn Software Is Still Not Created Equal..... - bullethead 19:22:27 03/11/07 (1)
- How do you run this? - rlw 09:44:20 03/12/07 (0)