Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - two sources, 2 polarities. What to do? - csintx 08:00:16 01/30/07 (27)

• Since LPs and CDs come both ways . . . - markrohr 09:17:47 01/30/07 (0)
• Why? Can you hear a difference? - risabet 08:32:59 01/30/07 (4)
• "It may be inverted already." With respect to what standard, exactly, I wonder? nt - clarkjohnsen 11:57:16 01/30/07 (3)
• Re: "It may be inverted already." With respect to what standard, exactly, I wonder? nt - risabet 19:56:27 01/30/07 (2)
• "Let us assume... that note recorded with compression is recorded as + ." And therein lies the trap! - clarkjohnsen 11:24:58 01/31/07 (1)
• This is navel gazing to the nth degree... - SE 14:07:57 01/31/07 (0)
• Easy...and not - lipmanl 08:31:17 01/30/07 (20)
• This is the best answer, but wouldn't it be nice to be able to just switch on the line stage to invert? nt - Norm 09:20:53 01/30/07 (19)
• [Sigh] nt - clarkjohnsen 11:55:53 01/30/07 (18)
• Re: [Sigh] nt - lipmanl 13:25:52 01/30/07 (17)
• "I don't understand the issue you have with absolute phase." Where have you been? - clarkjohnsen 14:01:17 01/30/07 (16)
• Clark, it was you in my room who used such a switch to change polarity to what you preferred. nt - Norm 16:53:00 01/30/07 (15)
• Norm, I *always* try to correct the polarity; what are you saying? nt - clarkjohnsen 18:42:48 01/30/07 (14)
• Is "correct the polarity" proper terminology? ( nt) - soulfood 07:18:00 01/31/07 (0)
• Re: Why are you sighing to my post? nt - Norm 20:36:19 01/30/07 (12)
• Because there are *so few* line stages on which to do that "nice" operation! Geez Luiz... nt - clarkjohnsen 11:27:03 01/31/07 (11)
• That is indeed the case. Why? nt - Norm 05:52:46 02/02/07 (10)
• Notice, the designated antagonist is at his charming best worst below. And you wonder why folks miss out on polarity!... - clarkjohnsen 10:11:50 02/02/07 (1)
• Now, you see, SETTING YOU STRAIGHT isn't bullying... - SE 10:59:13 02/02/07 (0)
• Good question. I think because people are so used to high amounts of phase distortion; polarity gets subsumed. Also... - clarkjohnsen 09:56:56 02/02/07 (7)
• But, of course, the REALLY sad part about you and polarity... - SE 10:05:18 02/02/07 (3)
• ...in other words (ready?)... - SE 10:21:51 02/02/07 (2)
• Another charmingly ditzy post from someone who knows naught of what he preaches. - clarkjohnsen 10:45:02 02/02/07 (1)
• Whatever. You're dismissed. n/t - SE 10:50:09 02/02/07 (0)
• In comparison to the likes of YOU clarkwit... - SE 10:00:43 02/02/07 (2)
• A delightfully typical post. Thank you! Now to make sure it isn't erased... - clarkjohnsen 10:04:28 02/02/07 (1)
• Consistency meets consistency. n/t - SE 10:06:39 02/02/07 (0)

Follow Ups

• Easy...and not - lipmanl 08:31:17 01/30/07 (20)
• This is the best answer, but wouldn't it be nice to be able to just switch on the line stage to invert? nt - Norm 09:20:53 01/30/07 (19)
• [Sigh] nt - clarkjohnsen 11:55:53 01/30/07 (18)
• Re: [Sigh] nt - lipmanl 13:25:52 01/30/07 (17)
• "I don't understand the issue you have with absolute phase." Where have you been? - clarkjohnsen 14:01:17 01/30/07 (16)
• Clark, it was you in my room who used such a switch to change polarity to what you preferred. nt - Norm 16:53:00 01/30/07 (15)
• Norm, I *always* try to correct the polarity; what are you saying? nt - clarkjohnsen 18:42:48 01/30/07 (14)
• Is "correct the polarity" proper terminology? ( nt) - soulfood 07:18:00 01/31/07 (0)
• Re: Why are you sighing to my post? nt - Norm 20:36:19 01/30/07 (12)
• Because there are *so few* line stages on which to do that "nice" operation! Geez Luiz... nt - clarkjohnsen 11:27:03 01/31/07 (11)
• That is indeed the case. Why? nt - Norm 05:52:46 02/02/07 (10)
• Notice, the designated antagonist is at his charming best worst below. And you wonder why folks miss out on polarity!... - clarkjohnsen 10:11:50 02/02/07 (1)
• Now, you see, SETTING YOU STRAIGHT isn't bullying... - SE 10:59:13 02/02/07 (0)
• Good question. I think because people are so used to high amounts of phase distortion; polarity gets subsumed. Also... - clarkjohnsen 09:56:56 02/02/07 (7)
• But, of course, the REALLY sad part about you and polarity... - SE 10:05:18 02/02/07 (3)
• ...in other words (ready?)... - SE 10:21:51 02/02/07 (2)
• Another charmingly ditzy post from someone who knows naught of what he preaches. - clarkjohnsen 10:45:02 02/02/07 (1)
• Whatever. You're dismissed. n/t - SE 10:50:09 02/02/07 (0)
• In comparison to the likes of YOU clarkwit... - SE 10:00:43 02/02/07 (2)
• A delightfully typical post. Thank you! Now to make sure it isn't erased... - clarkjohnsen 10:04:28 02/02/07 (1)
• Consistency meets consistency. n/t - SE 10:06:39 02/02/07 (0)