|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
|
|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
In Reply to: Re: "most SACD titles are poorly recorded" ? Hardly posted by Ozzie on December 26, 2006 at 10:01:58:
HowdyPerhaps not, most of my SACDs are recorded and mastered better than my most of my CDs. This says nothing about any one elses CD collections. However since I have most of the available SACDs and a non trivial number of CDs I felt my statements justified.
-Ted
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: "most SACD titles are poorly recorded" ? Hardly - Ted Smith 12:57:12 12/26/06 (7)
- Re: "most SACD titles are poorly recorded" ? Hardly - Ozzie 09:17:23 12/27/06 (6)
- Re: "most SACD titles are poorly recorded" ? Hardly - Ted Smith 15:13:49 12/27/06 (5)
- Re: "most SACD titles are poorly recorded" ? Hardly - Ozzie 11:01:03 01/02/07 (2)
- Sorry that we are talking at cross purposes... - Ted Smith 11:44:58 01/02/07 (1)
- Re: Sorry that we are talking at cross purposes... - Ozzie 10:57:16 01/03/07 (0)
- Re: "most SACD titles are poorly recorded" ? Hardly - jazz1 11:48:47 12/28/06 (1)
- Re: "most SACD titles are poorly recorded" ? Hardly - Ted Smith 12:23:43 12/28/06 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
