|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
Register / Login
|
|
|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
Register / Login
|
In Reply to: Re: Behringer: using SRC2496 with DEQ2496 posted by KKC on August 21, 2006 at 12:24:03:
Hi, this is a different Alan but I'll answer anyway. The balanced AES/EBU specification calls for a cable with a 110 ohm impedance, which regular balanced mic cables from Guitar Center do not have. Others on this forum have said they didn't hear a difference between a proper AES/EBU cable and a standard balanced xlr cable. I find that in going from the CD player to the DEQ2496, I like prefer the sound of an optical toslink cable instead of using the spdif output to the EAS/EBU input with an RCA to XLR adapter. However, since you will be able to go AES/EBU to EAS/EBU from the SRC to the DEQ, you may have better luck.While I don't own a SRC2496, the reason for using it before the DEQ is that the DEQ can then perform its digital signal processing on a 24 bit higher resolution signal instead of a 16 bit / 44.1kHz, and hence offer supposedly better quality. I haven't tried it myself but would definitely like to know what kind of difference you hear in your system with the SRC in place as compaired to leaving it out.
Alan (Jordan)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Behringer: using SRC2496 with DEQ2496 - aljordan 16:37:04 08/21/06 (1)
- Re: Behringer: using SRC2496 with DEQ2496 - Pinco Pallino 01:48:24 08/22/06 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
