In Reply to: RE: SSRC posted by cpuaudio on June 14, 2008 at 13:03:43:
I listened to SSRC much longer and at 24/96. I actually realized how inferior it was just a few seconds of listening. I have no customers using this to my knowledge. Like myself, they all found it inferior to SRC with Foobar 0.8.3.
If you are using Foobar 0.9.x, then this is a different story. The SRC for this version is not good.
I do not use ASIO, ASIO4ALL or Kernel Streaming with my products anymore. These are not necessary with my products, even with XP.
Steve N.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: SSRC - audioengr 13:57:02 06/14/08 (14)
- RE: SSRC - fmak 21:35:59 06/14/08 (2)
- The Myth of Foobar 0.8.3 - Scrith 19:03:40 06/14/08 (4)
- RE: The Myth of Foobar 0.8.3 - cpuaudio 14:52:29 06/15/08 (0)
- If you're using FLAC and foobar 0.8.3, youre kind of screwed - andy_c 21:21:48 06/14/08 (1)
- Yet ANOTHER reason to not do - Dawnrazor 00:07:11 06/15/08 (0)
- Foobar 0.8.3 - audioengr 20:14:52 06/14/08 (0)
- RE: SSRC - cpuaudio 16:52:41 06/14/08 (5)
- RE: SSRC-ASIO Issue - fmak 21:39:45 06/14/08 (3)
- RE: SSRC-ASIO Issue - cpuaudio 15:41:43 06/15/08 (2)
- RE: SSRC-ASIO Issue - audioengr 09:51:49 06/16/08 (1)
- RE: SSRC-ASIO Issue - cpuaudio 10:03:56 06/16/08 (0)
- RE: SSRC - audioengr 20:18:06 06/14/08 (0)