![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
66.65.86.69
In Reply to: So, you are telling me that Panny, Sony, etc. (digital amps) are better than Rowland, Pass, ML, etc.? posted by Gateway on August 21, 2004 at 15:30:34:
Its not a pass but for the money its the most organic non tube amp ive heard. For the record i have not heard the panny that is so well recieved but these little things are something special.Do not over analyze, listen listen and listen again. I have made my share of mistakes and i give these a solid ranking for the money
![]()
Follow Ups:
I agree with Kbuzz. I would add that if people don't like the digital amps and prefer analog that's great. That's why vinyl keeps chugging along. I wish the folks that are condemning any of these amps without listening to them would make the effort to listen to them. They could then say they were right or say hey this amp is not bad. One thing is for sure that because of the low costs involved this technology is going to be the dominate in the low to mid fi areas and will have a great impact on hi fi / high end.If this is the future maybe everyone should works towards encouraging all of these technologies to co-exist. I'm not giving up my OTL anytime soon. But for everyday use the Flying Moles are staying in the main system. It's sort of like hauling the kids (or whoever) around in the mini van or SUV and breaking out your convertible (MGB in my case) to tool around in on nice weekends.
Don't any of you tube guys need a summer amp? My OTL is HOT! And it's only 10 watts class A.
![]()
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: