|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
|
|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
In Reply to: AcDack1.3 vs 2.0 posted by Bahr on June 18, 2005 at 22:49:59:
I had an earlier version 1.1??? for about two years. It was a sweet sounding dac. Very nice midrange, a bit soft in the bass and a tad bit euphonic. Battery makes for a very low noise floor. It definitely got the music right. The lack of digital artifacts due to the NOS design was a large part of why I liked it so much.About 4 months ago I upgraded to the 2.0.
So far IME, version 2.0 is in another class. Better dynamics, greater resolution and extension in freq. extremes and less colored compared to the original. I feel like I can see into the performace with enhanced clarity. It a very musical product worthy of a high resolution system. Mine has Auricaps and not teflon.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Ack dAcks are a tremendous value - tommytube 23:46:29 06/18/05 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
