|
Tweakers' Asylum: REVIEW: Vanguard 24.576MHz TCXO Passive Components by Adriel Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
For Sale Ads |
70.179.2.11
Model: 24.576MHz TCXO Category: Passive Components Suggested Retail Price: $30.00 Description: ubiquitous 1PPM TCXO from ebay/chinese sellers Manufacturer URL: Not Available
Review by Adriel on November 11, 2009 at 11:09:55
IP Address: 70.179.2.11Add Your Review
for the 24.576MHz TCXO
-specs-
supply: 5 vdc
output: ttl/cmos
package: dip-14
To take advantage of hi-res digital downloads and computer-based upsampling, I needed to have a digital pathway of at least 96khz. The limiting factor in the chain was a 44.1khz reclocker by Monarchy Audio, "DIP Classic". Fortunately it was equipped with a pair of 14-pin DIP sockets, one for 44.1khz and the other for 96khz and made comparison-swapping very easy.
I once stumbled upon the actual manufacturer's website, but have since lost it. This tcxo is widely rebranded and pimped all over the internet. The round sticker probably covers a hole that contains an adjustment screw of some type.
For comparison against this tcxo, was a vcxo sent by Monarchy Audio, made by AEC company.
Playback utilized music from 44.1khz to 96khz.
Over a period of four weeks, I performed various swaps between the tcxo and vcxo, and let the natural process settle matters.
The take-away was the following:
1. when fed 44.1-48khz sources at their native resolution, the AEC vcxo suffered in sound quality when performing upsampling
2. the tcxo had a better musical performance overall from 44.1khz to 96khz
3. non-oversampling DACs had the biggest changes (usually beneficial) when fed by upsampled data
4. oversampling DACs usually exhibited sonic degradation (loss of detail) when fed upsampled data, or minute changes laterally
The best configuration in the end was to up/downsample all music from 44.1khz to 192khz, to a 96khz format to feed the reclocker, and keep the tcxo in place to handle upsampling of movie audio.
Product Weakness: sonically meaningless specification data: ppm, phase noise performance in the MHz range, suspect jitter charts Product Strengths: more musical than some other vcxo
Associated Equipment for this Review:
Amplifier: Sophia 300B monoblocks Preamplifier (or None if Integrated): Primaluna Prologue Two Sources (CDP/Turntable): Audio Note Dackit 2.0 Speakers: Omega Super 8 XRS Cables/Interconnects: Audioquest, Pangea Music Used (Genre/Selections): 1996-2009 Time Period/Length of Audition: 6 months Other (Power Conditioner etc.): PurePower APS Type of Audition/Review: Product Owner
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - REVIEW: Vanguard 24.576MHz TCXO Passive Components - Adriel 11:09:54 11/11/09 ( 5)
- RE: REVIEW: Vanguard 24.576MHz TCXO Passive Components - John Swenson 13:16:49 11/12/09 ( 3)
- RE: REVIEW: Vanguard 24.576MHz TCXO Passive Components - Adriel 15:04:22 11/14/09 ( 2)
- TCXO = temperature compensated - Slider 19:30:58 11/14/09 ( 1)
- ok - Adriel 10:22:22 11/18/09 ( 0)
DIP Classic specific info - Adriel 11:13:12 11/11/09 ( 0)