Home
AudioAsylum Trader
Amp/Preamp Asylum: REVIEW: EICO HF-35 Amplifier (Tube) by Richard CWY

Looking for a new Amp or Preamp? If you're after tubes, post over here.

For Sale Ads

FAQ / News / Events

 

REVIEW: EICO HF-35 Amplifier (Tube)

202.128.225.3


[ Follow Ups ] Thread:  [ Display   All   Email ] [ Amp/Preamp Asylum ]
[ Alert Moderator ]

Model: HF-35
Category: Amplifier (Tube)
Suggested Retail Price: $600 (vintage pair)
Description: Vintage EICO
Manufacturer URL: EICO
Model Picture: View

Review by Richard CWY ( A ) on November 05, 2002 at 01:44:20
IP Address: 202.128.225.3
Add Your Review
for the HF-35


**Review of vintage EICO HF-35, HF50 and HF-60 monoblocs**

Those who love playing expensive British audio gears would love these

EICOs. Yes, we found these EICOs possess the "British sound" -

clean, natural and balanced! We attribute these characteristics to

the use of Mullard 5-20 circuit. I added that the wise choice of

tubes (EF86 in front stage and 6SN7 in phase-splitting) and the use

of high quality oversized output transformers ensure quality sound!

We all agreed that the 3 EICOs gave smooth, well defined high range,

natural mid range, and solidly clean low range. String was as real as

being played in front. Yo-yo Ma's cello was detailed (in spite of the

limitation by BBC LS3/5As). Tsai Ching's voice was just sweet

enough.. Superb!

Now the finer comparison:

a) HF-35 has slightly more relaxed sound compared to HF-50 and HF-60,

particularly in the bass, which still remained decent and matched

well with BBC LS3/5As. These mini-monitors are acknowlegedly

difficult to drive and require high damping factor amps (please don't

confuse with 'high power' amp (grin)) for reasonable bass response.

HF-35 drive speakers beautifully.

b) HF-50 had more control over the bass compared to HF-35. It also

had slightly more refined high range. I believe that the HF-50 might

have a more linear response in the audio range than HF-35. This

hypothesis awaits confirmation by an oscillioscope(?).

c) HF-60 performed as good as HF-50 through the mini-monitors. Given

everything (circuit design, tubes, voltage, bias, etc) is the same

except the choice of output transformer, we felt it amusing that the

Acrosound iron could turn out 10 extra watts. Whilst it might seem

to provide 'no edge' to own HF-60s compared to HF-50, I feel that the

true potential of the Acrosound output transformer may have not yet

been explored or exploited through these mini-monitors.

To conclude, I would say all these EICO monoblocs are wonderful

vintage amps, designed and built in the golden era of tube audio.

There seems to be a slight advantage in sound from HF-50 and HF-60 in

comparison with HF-35. However, we felt the edge is simply

insignificant. Given the price differences between HF-35 (about $600

a pair), HF-50 (about $800 a pair), and HF-60 (about $1,100 a pair),

I would say if you use mini-monitors as we used in the Party, you

could save your money by owning HF-35s, which sound almost as good as

the double-pricer flagships.

However, if you match your EICO monoblocs with larger loudspeakers,

perhaps HF-50 or HF-60 may become your worthwhile choices. But,

again, this proposition yet awaits confirmation.

Richard

(More details in EICO Fans' Newsgroup: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eico/)


Product Weakness: Nil.
Product Strengths: The entire "HF" series ultra-linear monoblocs are great value vintage amps.


Associated Equipment for this Review:
Amplifier: EICO HF-60, HF-50, & HF-35
Preamplifier (or None if Integrated): Jadis JP-200 (clone)
Sources (CDP/Turntable): CD
Speakers: BBC LS3/5A monitors
Cables/Interconnects: N/A
Music Used (Genre/Selections): Female vocal, Cello concerto
Other (Power Conditioner etc.): N/A
Type of Audition/Review: Home Audition




This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Amplified Parts  



Topic - REVIEW: EICO HF-35 Amplifier (Tube) - Richard CWY 01:44:20 11/5/02 ( 0)